Plastic Bags Get the Boot; But Is Paper Any Better?

Let’s face it, sometimes you’ll forget to bring your own bag. We think that makes this story from EarthTalk a must-read reality check on paper vs. plastic and which is ultimately the more eco-friendly choice.


Q. Which shopping bags are more environmentally friendly: paper or plastic? And didn’t I hear that San Francisco has banned plastic bags?     

– Brian, Santa Clara, Calif.

A. Yes the city of San Francisco did ban plastic bags. Large supermarkets and pharmacies there must eliminate plastic shopping bags by early 2008 in favor of bags made from either paper or compostable and biodegradable cornstarch. The city’s Board of Supervisors cited the fact that plastic bags are a challenge to recycle and as a result occupy much-needed landfill space, while causing litter problems by easily blowing into trees and waterways, where they can kill birds and marine life.

But just because San Francisco has outlawed plastic bags doesn’t mean that all indications point to paper bags being more green-friendly than plastic. A landmark 1990 study by the research firm Franklin Associates — which factored in every step of the manufacturing, distribution and disposal stages of a grocery bag’s usable life — actually gave the nod to plastic bags.

Franklin’s employed two critical measures in reaching their conclusion. The first was the total energy consumed by a grocery bag. This included both the energy needed to manufacture it, called process energy, and the energy embodied within the physical materials used, called feedstock energy. The second measure used was the amount of pollutants and waste produced.

The Franklin report concluded that two plastic bags consume 13 percent less total energy than one paper bag. Additionally, the report found that two plastic bags produce a quarter of the solid waste, a fifteenth as much waterborne waste and half the atmospheric waste as one paper bag.

Yet many environmentalists still side with paper as a better choice than plastic at checkout, mostly for the reasons cited by San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors. Plastic is not biodegradable, it litters our waterways and coastal areas, and has been shown to choke the life out of unsuspecting wildlife.

A recent survey by the United Nations found that plastic in the world’s oceans is killing more than a million seabirds and 100,000 marine mammals and sea turtles each and every year. And according to the California Coastal Commission, plastic bags are one of the 12 most commonly found items in coastal cleanups.

Paper bags do not cause such after-the-fact problems, and are inherently easier to recycle.

Of course, the answer is really “neither.” The nonprofit Institute for Lifecycle Environmental Assessment points out that “paper versus plastic?” is not the question we should be asking. After all, energy and waste issues aside, the manufacture of paper bags brings down some 14 million trees yearly to meet U.S. demand alone, while plastic bags use up some 12 million barrels of oil each year.

The group urges consumers to “just say no” to both options and instead bring their own re-usable canvas bags, backpacks, crates or boxes to haul away the groceries. Some supermarkets, such as the Albertson’s and Wild Oats chains, even offer a small discount (around five cents) to those who do so. Another benefit of bringing your own, of course, is setting a good example so that other shoppers might do the same.

Find out what Gaiam Life members are saying about plastic vs. paper vs. the alternatives in the Green Living Discussion Board.


Send it to: EarthTalk, c/o E/The Environmental Magazine, P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881; submit it online, or send an e-mail. To read past columns, visit the EarthTalk archives.



Thank you for signing up!

Add comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.